I accompanied your despatch no. 8 of the 13th of January last.
2. I can see that Section 4 of this Ordinance should be amended by repealing so much of it as repeals Ordinance 7 of 1864, which occasions it is desirable that the Special Edition of the compiled laws under the Legislative Council remain in force until authorized the new Edition of the laws of the colony has been completed and made authentic by statute.
3. In regard to the opening words of your despatch under reference, I have to point out to you that the Colonial Office despatches no 65 of the 21st May, and no 224 of the 24th of September last, and the Circular of the 14th August, 1866, do not refer to the subjects dealt with in the Ordinance transmitted in your despatch under reference; but
I
accompanied your
despatch no. 8 of the
PB 13th of January
last.
2. I can, that
ত্য
4
Section & of this Ordinance
should be amended
by repeating so much
of it
as repeals Ordinance
7 of 1864, which occlinans
ad
it is desinthe that the
Should is my Spenar
Edition the
compiled
under the Leging that Adreen. remain in force until
anthanized
should retain its
the new Edition of the
laws of the colony
I has been
completect
>
ond
0
made authentic by
statute.
3. In regard to the opening world of you desp. under
18
joan
ach? I have to point out
<<
to the fuck
that the Colonial office
deshateles no 65 of the
215h May, and no
224 of the 24 th of Septemb
last, and the Corculan
of the 14th August, 100%,
do not refer to the
Subjects dealt with
in the Ordinance fraus-
mitted inn
"
youn deshabel
Lider ; but
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.